09 · DIPLOMACY · QADESH
Treaty with Egypt
Peace needed two versions and many gods as witnesses
Egypt and Hatti agreed peace, mutual aid and extradition in a treaty preserved in two versions.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
Years after Qadesh, Hattusili III and Ramesses II sealed a peace treaty, alliance and extradition. An Akkadian version was preserved in Hattusa and the Egyptian version was carved in temples; both present the pact from their own chancery.
It is often called the first peace treaty in history, a formula too absolute. Its value lies in the parallel preservation, the invocation of gods and the transformation of enemies into partners facing new pressures.
The agreement between Hattusili III and Ramesses II articulated peace, alliance, succession and extradition under the guarantee of gods. Surviving cuneiform copies and hieroglyphic versions allow comparison of the two chanceries.
The versions are not identical facsimiles and the date is reconstructed from regnal chronology. Calling it the 'first peace treaty' ignores earlier agreements and confuses the best-preserved parallel example with a universal beginning.
Evidence and interpretation
Documented fact: cuneiform and hieroglyphic copies survive of the same agreement between Hatti and Egypt. Interpretation and caution: it cannot be demonstrated that it was the first treaty ever signed; the exact date and equivalences between versions require textual criticism.
Catalogue facts
- Narrative date
- c. 1259 BCE, year 21 of Ramesses II
- Location
- Hattusa and Egypt
- Material
- Clay tablets · monumental hieroglyphic inscription
- Context
- Interstate treaty between Hattusili III and Ramesses II
- Curatorial reading
- The documented fact and its interpretation appear separately in the evidence block.
- Date
- c. 1259 BCE, year 21 of Ramesses II
- Location
- Hattusa and Egypt
- Support
- Clay tablets · monumental hieroglyphic inscription
- Documentary coverage
- 3 museum, heritage, primary corpus or research sources for this stop.
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
Clay32 dated objects

≈29,000–27,000 years
Dolní Věstonice I
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
mid-6th–5th millennium BCE
Before Sumer
Sumer
The full 6th–5th millennia BCE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record qualifies the date as ‘mid’; the item's date is used, not the broader preceding period.
Read the record
Early Neolithic · VI–V millennia BCE
Twin-chambered vessel from Cova de l’Or
Prehistory
Interval of the VI–V millennia BCE; no precise annual date.
Read the record
ca. 4400–3800 BCE
Before Egypt
Ancient Egypt
Date of the representative vessel, not of the entire predynastic period.
Read the record
V–IV millennium BCE
Before Nubia
Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Interval of the V–IV millennia BCE of the element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
Middle Neolithic, c. 4000 BCE
Before Gojoseon
Gojoseon and early Korea
Date of the ceramic element, not of the preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 3500–3000 BCE
Bevel-rimmed bowl
Sumer
The wage ration hypothesis is not used as a functional label.
Read the record
3500–2900 BCE · proto-urban period; towards 3300 BCE as a guide, not exact date
Susa accounting bulla
Sumer
Posted range; "towards 3300" is just orientation within that range.
Read the record
c. 3100–2900 BCE
Jemdet Nasr
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 3100–2900 BCE
Account of malt and barley
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Middle Jōmon, ca. 3000 BCE
Before Yayoi
Yayoi Japan
Date of the Jōmon element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 2500–2200 BCE
Vasiliki
Greek worlds
Date range for the regional pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Before Ancient China
Ancient China
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Longshan
Ancient China
Date range for the Longshan pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 19th century BCE
Before the Hittites
Hittites
Date of the representative document, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
Kotosh-Mito Tradition, c. 2200–1500 BCE; the enclosure is usually situated around 1800 BCE.
Before Pre-Inca Cultures
Pre-Inca cultures
Element tradition interval; "around 1800" orients the enclosure.
Read the record
19th–18th centuries BCE
Queen of the Night
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Paleo-Babylonian period · around 1800 BCE
Plimpton 322
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 1800 BCE
Sumerian King List
Sumer
Date of preserved copy, not of reigns listed.
Read the record
Paleo-Babylonian copy, around 1900–1600 BCE according to CDLI
Love song to Shu-Sin
Sumer
Date of the preserved Paleo-Babylonian copy, not of the origin of the song.
Read the record
Towards 1900–1600 BCE · paleobabylonian; uncertain chronological attribution in CDLI
Si.427 tablet
Sumer
Unclear chronological attribution in CDLI.
Read the record
≈1700–1650 BCE
Phaistos Disc
Greek worlds
The signs have no accepted reading.
Read the record
Towards 1650 BCE
Sumerian Flood of Nippur
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Above all 17th–13th centuries BCE
Overlapping datesBoğazköy Archive
Hittites
Main date range for the archive, not a single date for all the tablets.
Read the record
c. 1375 BCE
Linear B
Greek worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 1300 BCE
Alaksandu of Wilusa
Hittites
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
You are viewingc. 1259 BCE, year 21 of Ramesses II
Treaty with Egypt
Hittites
Date of the treaty and its copy; not of the origin of relations between the two kingdoms.
Current record
7th century BCE
Flood Tablet
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 700–500 BCE
Babylonian map of the world
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
522–486 BCE
Glazed brick guards
Achaemenid Persia
Date range associated with the reign of the decoration.
Read the record
Towards 509–493 BCE
Rations for women and children
Achaemenid Persia
Date range of the archive and its documents.
Read the record
regional range c. 800 BCE–650 CE
Urewe vessel
Bantu-speaking worlds
Regional date range for the Urewe type, not an individual date for each vessel.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (8)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- A White Wall on the DanubeCeltic worlds · 6th century BCE
- Blue that does not yieldMaya worlds · Documented use from the Classic, c. 300–1500 CE
- Cyrus speaks as king of BabylonAchaemenid Persia · After the conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE
- Early potteryMande Worlds · before ca. 9400 cal BCE
- Made in GaramaGaramantes · I millennium BCE–I millennium CE
- Piece-mold castingAncient China · c. 1600–1046 BCE
- The unfinished gestureBatwa / Twa histories · 1947
- Vessels without a languageBantu-speaking worlds · Urewe, broad regional range ca. 800 BCE–650 CE
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
The return of fugitives included conditions
The treaty is not limited to promising friendship between monarchs: it regulates the return of persons who fled from one territory to the other. The Egyptian version translated in Ancient Near Eastern Texts adds guarantees against their execution, mutilation and destruction of their houses or families. These clauses show that the movement of persons was a negotiated diplomatic matter. They do not constitute a universal declaration of rights nor allow verification of each return, but they do document concrete restrictions formulated within the agreement between the two courts.
Location and territory
LOCATED SITE
Hattusa and Yazılıkaya · TurkeyLandscape marker of the Hittite capital.Where it is held
İstanbul Archaeology Museums · Museum of Ancient Oriental Art
Item or group in the record · On display
The official portal of Turkish museums confirms that two copies found in Hattusa are exhibited in the museum; they are not confused with the United Nations replica.
The holding institution is documented; public display may change. Check its official record before visiting.
Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…