Skip to content
TRACEKEEPERS
Menu
← Back to the collection

15 · TREASURE · before ca. 9400 cal BCE

Early pottery

Early pottery assemblage from Ounjougou

These fragments are one of the early pieces of evidence for pottery making in Africa.

Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.

DECLARED VISUAL RECONSTRUCTION · AI-GENERATED IMAGE · TRACEKEEPERS

Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis

Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.

Visual proposal for Early pottery assemblage from Ounjougou, Ravin de la Mouche and the Ounjougou sequence, Bandiagara Plateau, Mali
DECLARED VISUAL RECONSTRUCTION · AI-GENERATED IMAGE · TRACEKEEPERS

Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis

Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.

History and context

Fragments in stratigraphic context provide some of the early evidence for pottery production in Africa.

Technology associated with new Holocene conditions and intensive use of plant resources. Limitation: it does not establish a Mandé identity or a continuous cultural lineage extending to Ghana or Mali.

Evidence and interpretation

ARQ. Fragments in stratigraphic context provide some of the early evidence for pottery production in Africa. What this does not establish: a Mandé identity or a continuous cultural lineage extending to Ghana or Mali.

Catalogue facts

Narrative date
before ca. 9400 cal BCE
Location
Ravin de la Mouche and the Ounjougou sequence, Bandiagara Plateau, Mali
Material
archaeological assemblage
Context
Research material associated with excavation seasons in Mali; no transfer is proposed until the inventory and repository are confirmed. Custody: Mali’s heritage authorities and the Ounjougou archaeological project/University of Geneva; the exact repository of each fragment must be verified before any loan or reproduction.
Curatorial reading
The documented fact and its interpretation appear separately in the evidence block.
Dossier axis
technology
Research record
MANDE · EVI-01
Documentary coverage
1 museum source, heritage, primary corpus or research for this stop.

A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS

Objects connected through time

Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.

The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.

THE CURRENT OBJECT

Its date is not sufficiently established to place it on the timeline. We keep it here, separate from the dated objects.

Clay32 dated objects

1 / 32In the centre: Dolní Věstonice I

Also connected, without a comparable date (7)

These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.

A closer look

About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .

What three fragments reveal

In Ravin de la Mouche, three fragments associated with the initial phase come from the base of unit HA1A. Their thickness ranges from 4.5 to 7 millimetres; one allows recognition of a hemispherical bowl about 21 centimetres in diameter. Microscopy identified quartz inclusions similar to those of local clays and sandstones, without clear signs of intentionally added temper. In contrast, the later fragments from Ravin du Hibou include comb decoration. Distinguishing these groups avoids attributing all observed technique to the oldest pottery.

Sources and references

Expand this information and consult its sources

Did you enjoy this exhibit?

Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.

Loading your rating…