CONNECTION, NOT IBERIAN PIECE · INDIGENOUS TRADITION · 2nd CENTURY BCE–1st CENTURY CE
Ceramics that continued
Conquering a city did not immediately extinguish its workshops
Some workshops continued using local techniques and decorations during Roman rule.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction; not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
In the valleys of the Segre and the Cinca, late painted indigenous ceramics and Roman series of indigenous tradition are documented from the last third of the 2nd century BCE well into the 1st century CE. The production chains did not disappear in a generation.
The workshops selected what to conserve and what to transform: Italian forms could coexist with local decoration, new kilns and distribution networks. Continuity does not mean immobility, but technical negotiation within another political system.
Hispanic terra sigillata does not simply derive from this tradition: its technological genealogy relates to Italian and south Gaulish models. Confusing the two series erases precisely the interaction that is of interest to explain.
Evidence and interpretation
Documented fact: productive sequences, techniques and chronologies of indigenous painted ceramics under Roman rule. Interpretation and caution: not all ceramics manufactured in Hispania are Iberian heritage nor does all continuity imply intact ethnic identity.
Catalogue facts
- Narrative date
- Last third of the 2nd century BCE–1st century CE
- Location
- Valleys of the Segre and the Cinca
- Material
- Wheel-thrown painted ceramics
- Context
- Local workshops within Roman markets
- Classification
- Comparative connection · must not be presented as an Iberian piece
- Visual reference
- Typological plates from the article by Ignasi Garcés
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
Ceramics39 dated objects

≈29,000–27,000 years
Dolní Věstonice I
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
mid-6th–5th millennium BCE
Before Sumer
Sumer
The full 6th–5th millennia BCE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record qualifies the date as ‘mid’; the item's date is used, not the broader preceding period.
Read the record
Early Neolithic · VI–V millennia BCE
Twin-chambered vessel from Cova de l’Or
Prehistory
Interval of the VI–V millennia BCE; no precise annual date.
Read the record
ca. 4400–3800 BCE
Before Egypt
Ancient Egypt
Date of the representative vessel, not of the entire predynastic period.
Read the record
V–IV millennium BCE
Before Nubia
Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Interval of the V–IV millennia BCE of the element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
Middle Neolithic, c. 4000 BCE
Before Gojoseon
Gojoseon and early Korea
Date of the ceramic element, not of the preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 3500–3000 BCE
Bevel-rimmed bowl
Sumer
The wage ration hypothesis is not used as a functional label.
Read the record
Middle Jōmon, ca. 3000 BCE
Before Yayoi
Yayoi Japan
Date of the Jōmon element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 2500–2200 BCE
Vasiliki
Greek worlds
Date range for the regional pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 2400–2200 BCE
Before the Greeks
Greek worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 2550–2030 BCE
Cemetery R-37
Indus civilisation
Interval of the cemetery and its funerary group.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Before Ancient China
Ancient China
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Longshan
Ancient China
Date range for the Longshan pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 1802–1640 BCE
Kerma vessel
Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
circa 1750–1550 BCE
Burial at K IV
Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Chronology of the funerary assemblage.
Read the record
c. 1900–1300 BCE
Before Vedic India
Vedic and later Indian worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 1700/1650–1200 BCE
Osmankayası and Ilıca
Hittites
The envelope of the explicit numerical alternatives is used as an orientative ordering framework: start towards 1700 or 1650 BCE and end towards 1200 BCE; framework of funerary assemblages, not a single manufacturing date.
Read the record
c. 1100–800 BCE in the classical sequence of Hastinapura
Grey bowl from Hastinapura
Vedic and later Indian worlds
Range of the Hastinapura pottery sequence, not the date of each vessel.
Read the record
ca. 850–800 BCE
Before Etruscans and Rome
Etruscans and Rome
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
9th–8th centuries BCE
The urn under the helmet
Etruscans and Rome
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
8th–7th centuries BCE · orientalizing
Ceramic stand 1010
Iberians
Chronology of the funerary context of Tomb 5, Orientalising horizon.
Read the record
7th–6th centuries BCE · work of Nebuchadnezzar II
Ishtar Gate
Sumer
Wide interval of the piece and its phases; The museum setup is modern.
Read the record
522–486 BCE
Glazed brick guards
Achaemenid Persia
Date range associated with the reign of the decoration.
Read the record
circa 440 BCE; attributed to the London Painter E 497.
Orpheus among the Thracians
Thracians
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
4th century BCE
The Attic krater that took on a new life in Cástulo
Greek worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
664–30 BCE
Overlapping datesThoth in the form of a baboon
Ancient Egypt
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Last third 4th–early 3rd century BCE
Leipzig Fish Plate
Greek worlds
The full 4th–3rd centuries BCE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record specifies the last third of the 4th century and the early 3rd.
Read the record
3rd century BCE
Dove of the Amarejo
Iberians
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
3rd–early 2nd century BCE
Overlapping datesVas dels Guerrers
Iberians
The full 3rd–2nd centuries BCE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record specifies the 3rd century and the early 2nd.
Read the record
3rd–2nd centuries BCE
Overlapping datesWarriors' Vase
Iberians
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
2nd–1st centuries BCE
Overlapping datesNorthern mound
Yayoi Japan
Date of the funerary assemblage.
Read the record
2nd–1st centuries BCE
Overlapping datesKalathos of Alcorisa
Iberians
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
regional range c. 800 BCE–650 CE
Overlapping datesUrewe vessel
Bantu-speaking worlds
Regional date range for the Urewe type, not an individual date for each vessel.
Read the record
Mainly Middle Yayoi, 2nd century BCE–1st century CE
Overlapping datesTwo rows of coffins
Yayoi Japan
Framework of the cemetery and its ceramic coffins.
Read the record
You are viewingLast third of the 2nd century BCE–1st century CE
Ceramics that continued
Iberians
The full 2nd century BCE–1st century CE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record specifies the last third of the 2nd century BCE and the 1st century CE; this is a production date range, not the date of an individual object.
Current record
3rd–4th centuries CE
Egyptian oil lamp with a fish, held in Laon
Ancient Egypt
3rd–4th centuries CE
Read the record
3rd–4th centuries CE
Laon lamp with fish
Etruscans and Rome
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 400 CE
Kabusanza, ca. 400
Batwa / Twa histories
Approximate date of the Kabusanza context; no automatic ethnic attribution.
Read the record
13th–15th centuries according to the heritage overview
Missing grave goods
Bantu-speaking worlds
Date range of the burial assemblage; incomplete individual inventories.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (17)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- A Kerma vessel deposited at AbydosAncient Egypt · Second Intermediate Period
- A tradition that inventsBatwa / Twa histories · collected in 1993 or 1995
- A vase travels; the rite changesIberians · No individual dating published on this record
- AkrotiriGreek worlds · c. 1700–1500 BCE
- Dia’s strataMande Worlds · 9th century BCE–2nd millennium CE
- Early potteryMande Worlds · before ca. 9400 cal BCE
- Jenne-jeno contextsMande Worlds · ca. 250 BCE–1400 CE
- Liédena FlaskEtruscans and Rome · Roman period · individual chronology not published in the entry
- LothalIndus civilisation · ca. 2400–1600 BCE
- Made in GaramaGaramantes · I millennium BCE–I millennium CE
- Nile towards NubiaAncient Egypt · ca. 3300–2800 BCE
- The unfinished gestureBatwa / Twa histories · 1947
- Three hundred lives in the sandYayoi Japan · Mainly 4th century BCE–3rd century CE
- Travelling objectsGaramantes · Mainly Roman period
- Trumpet from NumantiaIberians · No individual dating published on this record
- Urns from AdichanallurVedic and later Indian worlds · Iron Age · samples towards 665 and 467 BCE
- Vessels without a languageBantu-speaking worlds · Urewe, broad regional range ca. 800 BCE–650 CE
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
When the order of painting is inverted
The ceramics of Raïmat type show a technical modification not immediately visible. In numerous fragments, potters applied a coloured wash after painting the motifs, inverting the order observed in the Olriols type. Ignasi Garcés recognises this because, when the paint partially detaches, the drawing remains in negative. These final layers could be orange, reddish or pinkish and appear in nearly half of the studied Raïmat specimens. The continuity of a decorative repertoire therefore coexisted with specific changes in the manufacturing sequence.
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Valleys of the Segre and the CincaMediterranean fringe and southern peninsula; not all Iberia was Iberian. The footprint indicates the orientative centre of the area, not a boundary nor an exact point.Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…