BEFORE HATTI · c. 3000–1650 BCE
Before the Hittites
The empire began with a miscount
Before the Hittite empire, the cities of Anatolia already had merchants, debts and written accounts.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
Before Hattusa ruled an empire, central Anatolia was divided among cities, principalities and different languages. Communities linked to the Hattian world coexisted with Indo-European-speaking populations, and their rulers competed for metal, routes and land. At the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE, merchants arriving from Assur installed mercantile quarters in Kanesh and other centres.
Their caravans carried textiles and tin; they returned with silver and left thousands of letters, loans and lawsuits in clay. Assyrian and Anatolian families traded, litigated and intermarried long before the Hittite kingdom. After the crisis of those networks, the kings of Kussara conquered Kanesh and Hattusa. The future empire was born of that plural world, not of an isolated people.
Evidence and interpretation
Documented fact: A domestic tablet records silver invested in tin, textiles and lapis lazuli, as well as guides, donkeys, clothing and fodder for the journey. At the end, the scribe noted a total slightly higher than that produced by his own figures. The error preserves something extraordinarily human: international trade, accounting and review were already functioning in Anatolia before the Hittite kingdom. Interpretation and caution: The arithmetic discrepancy is readable in this account, but it does not allow attributing general incompetence to the scribe nor reconstructing a specific complete journey. Historical transition: The crisis of the mercantile quarters and the conquests of the kings of Kussara reordered an urban and multilingual world from which the Old Hittite Kingdom emerged. Limit of the transition: The merchants were largely Assyrian and the Anatolian populations spoke several languages; the Kanesh archive must not be presented as a Hittite state administration.
Catalogue facts
- Previous period
- c. 3000–1650 BCE
- Sphere of influence
- Central Anatolia, with focus on Kültepe-Kanesh, Kussara and Hattusa
- Threshold element
- Kanesh caravan account
- Element date
- c. 19th century BCE
- Location
- Kültepe-Kanesh, Central Anatolia, Turkey
- Material or support
- Cuneiform tablet of mercantile accounting
- Time frame
- c. 3000–1650 BCE
- Documented fact 01
- Kültepe preserves around 23,500 tablets, mostly private archives.
- Documented fact 02
- The caravans moved tin and textiles in exchange for silver and gold during journeys of several weeks.
- Documented fact 03
- Cuneiform writing reached this network through Assyrian merchants; it did not originate with the Hittite state.
- Visual credit
- The Metropolitan Museum of Art · CC0
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
Clay32 dated objects

≈29,000–27,000 years
Dolní Věstonice I
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
mid-6th–5th millennium BCE
Before Sumer
Sumer
The full 6th–5th millennia BCE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record qualifies the date as ‘mid’; the item's date is used, not the broader preceding period.
Read the record
Early Neolithic · VI–V millennia BCE
Twin-chambered vessel from Cova de l’Or
Prehistory
Interval of the VI–V millennia BCE; no precise annual date.
Read the record
ca. 4400–3800 BCE
Before Egypt
Ancient Egypt
Date of the representative vessel, not of the entire predynastic period.
Read the record
V–IV millennium BCE
Before Nubia
Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Interval of the V–IV millennia BCE of the element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
Middle Neolithic, c. 4000 BCE
Before Gojoseon
Gojoseon and early Korea
Date of the ceramic element, not of the preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 3500–3000 BCE
Bevel-rimmed bowl
Sumer
The wage ration hypothesis is not used as a functional label.
Read the record
3500–2900 BCE · proto-urban period; towards 3300 BCE as a guide, not exact date
Susa accounting bulla
Sumer
Posted range; "towards 3300" is just orientation within that range.
Read the record
c. 3100–2900 BCE
Jemdet Nasr
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 3100–2900 BCE
Account of malt and barley
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Middle Jōmon, ca. 3000 BCE
Before Yayoi
Yayoi Japan
Date of the Jōmon element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 2500–2200 BCE
Vasiliki
Greek worlds
Date range for the regional pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Before Ancient China
Ancient China
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Longshan
Ancient China
Date range for the Longshan pottery assemblage.
Read the record
You are viewingc. 19th century BCE
Before the Hittites
Hittites
Date of the representative document, not of the entire preceding period.
Current record
Kotosh-Mito Tradition, c. 2200–1500 BCE; the enclosure is usually situated around 1800 BCE.
Overlapping datesBefore Pre-Inca Cultures
Pre-Inca cultures
Element tradition interval; "around 1800" orients the enclosure.
Read the record
19th–18th centuries BCE
Overlapping datesQueen of the Night
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Paleo-Babylonian period · around 1800 BCE
Plimpton 322
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 1800 BCE
Sumerian King List
Sumer
Date of preserved copy, not of reigns listed.
Read the record
Paleo-Babylonian copy, around 1900–1600 BCE according to CDLI
Overlapping datesLove song to Shu-Sin
Sumer
Date of the preserved Paleo-Babylonian copy, not of the origin of the song.
Read the record
Towards 1900–1600 BCE · paleobabylonian; uncertain chronological attribution in CDLI
Overlapping datesSi.427 tablet
Sumer
Unclear chronological attribution in CDLI.
Read the record
≈1700–1650 BCE
Phaistos Disc
Greek worlds
The signs have no accepted reading.
Read the record
Towards 1650 BCE
Sumerian Flood of Nippur
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Above all 17th–13th centuries BCE
Boğazköy Archive
Hittites
Main date range for the archive, not a single date for all the tablets.
Read the record
c. 1375 BCE
Linear B
Greek worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 1300 BCE
Alaksandu of Wilusa
Hittites
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 1259 BCE, year 21 of Ramesses II
Treaty with Egypt
Hittites
Date of the treaty and its copy; not of the origin of relations between the two kingdoms.
Read the record
7th century BCE
Flood Tablet
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 700–500 BCE
Babylonian map of the world
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
522–486 BCE
Glazed brick guards
Achaemenid Persia
Date range associated with the reign of the decoration.
Read the record
Towards 509–493 BCE
Rations for women and children
Achaemenid Persia
Date range of the archive and its documents.
Read the record
regional range c. 800 BCE–650 CE
Urewe vessel
Bantu-speaking worlds
Regional date range for the Urewe type, not an individual date for each vessel.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (8)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- A White Wall on the DanubeCeltic worlds · 6th century BCE
- Blue that does not yieldMaya worlds · Documented use from the Classic, c. 300–1500 CE
- Cyrus speaks as king of BabylonAchaemenid Persia · After the conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE
- Early potteryMande Worlds · before ca. 9400 cal BCE
- Made in GaramaGaramantes · I millennium BCE–I millennium CE
- Piece-mold castingAncient China · c. 1600–1046 BCE
- The unfinished gestureBatwa / Twa histories · 1947
- Vessels without a languageBantu-speaking worlds · Urewe, broad regional range ca. 800 BCE–650 CE
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
The cost of the journey was within the account
The Met caravan account records investments, but also clothing and wages for guides, donkeys, equipment and fodder. The animals themselves could be sold on arrival in Anatolia. The document allows tracking expenses that the prestige of tin or textiles usually obscures. Moreover, its final sum slightly exceeds the total of the preserved items and shows erasures. Ancient accounting was not infallible: errors and corrections are part of the evidence on how commercial balances were prepared and reviewed.
- Museum · The Metropolitan Museum of Art · Caravan account 66.245.10Access recorded: .
The region before this culture
c. 3000–1650 BCE · Central Anatolia, with focus on Kültepe-Kanesh, Kussara and Hattusa
c. 3000–2000 BCE · Documented
Bronze Age Principalities
Cities, metallurgy and communities linked to the Hattian world shared Anatolia with several languages and networks.
c. 1950–1700 BCE · Documented
The karum of Kanesh
Assyrian merchants brought tin and textiles, obtained silver and filled domestic archives with contracts and letters.
c. 1750–1650 BCE · Documented
The kings of Kussara
The conquests associated with Anitta reorganised Kanesh and Hattusa before the formation of the Old Hittite Kingdom.
What changes and what we should not assume
The crisis of the mercantile quarters and the conquests of the kings of Kussara reordered an urban and multilingual world from which the Old Hittite Kingdom emerged.
The merchants were largely Assyrian and the Anatolian populations spoke several languages; the Kanesh archive must not be presented as a Hittite state administration.
Kanesh caravan account
c. 19th century BCE · Kültepe-Kanesh, Central Anatolia, Turkey
A domestic tablet records silver invested in tin, textiles and lapis lazuli, as well as guides, donkeys, clothing and fodder for the journey. At the end, the scribe noted a total slightly higher than that produced by his own figures. The error preserves something extraordinarily human: international trade, accounting and review were already functioning in Anatolia before the Hittite kingdom. A mistaken sum turns a four-thousand-year-old trade network into a recognisable and memorable human scene.
A domestic tablet records silver invested in tin, textiles and lapis lazuli, as well as guides, donkeys, clothing and fodder for the journey. At the end, the scribe noted a total slightly higher than that produced by his own figures. The error preserves something extraordinarily human: international trade, accounting and review were already functioning in Anatolia before the Hittite kingdom.
The arithmetic discrepancy is readable in this account, but it does not allow attributing general incompetence to the scribe nor reconstructing a specific complete journey.
Cuneiform tablet of mercantile accounting
Wikimedia Commons · Cuneiform_tablet-_caravan_account_MET_DP-13441-005.jpg · The Metropolitan Museum of Art · CC0
- Time frame
- c. 3000–1650 BCE
- Documented fact 01
- Kültepe preserves around 23,500 tablets, mostly private archives.
- Documented fact 02
- The caravans moved tin and textiles in exchange for silver and gold during journeys of several weeks.
- Documented fact 03
- Cuneiform writing reached this network through Assyrian merchants; it did not originate with the Hittite state.
Where it is held
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Reference material evidence · Documented collection
Caravan account 66.245.10 from Kültepe used as testimony of the pre-Hittite context; the Met indicates it is not on display.
The holding institution is documented; public display may change. Check its official record before visiting.
Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…