English
Español
Français
Italiano
Deutsch
Русский
Português
Polski
Română
Svenska
Norsk bokmål
Suomi
Türkçe
العربية
简体中文
한국어
हिन्दी
ΕλληνικάINITIAL ATLAS · ORIGIN AND EXPANSION
Hittite Map
Hittite Atlas
Explore the Hittite cities of Anatolia and the changes of their frontiers.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Editorial visualisation · Contextual correspondence
Declared editorial visualisation, based on the cartography and sources of the fact sheet; it is not an exact historical frontier.
History and context
The map begins in Kaneš and Anatolian principalities and allows advancing through 7 phases. The documented places — Kaneš/Kültepe, Hattusa, Karkemish — appear only when they help to read the active period.
The maximum expansion was episodic; vassalage, alliance and direct administration are not equivalent.
Evidence and interpretation
The coast comes from Natural Earth. The layers distinguish origin, core, direct control, influence, networks, disputed territories and external domains; they are approximate curatorial envelopes, not modern borders. The faint outline preserves the previous phase to make each expansion, contraction or absorption visible. The maximum expansion was episodic; vassalage, alliance and direct administration are not equivalent.
Catalogue facts
- Reading mode
- Origin, sequence and changing scope
- Sequence
- 7 phases · Kaneš and Anatolian principalities (c. 2000–1700 BCE) → Old Kingdom of Hatti (c. 1650–1500 BCE) → Middle Kingdom and recomposition (c. 1500–1430 BCE) → Imperial Expansion (c. 1430–1320 BCE) → Qadesh, treaty and maturity (c. 1320–1200 BCE) → End of the empire (c. 1200–1180 BCE) → Syro-Anatolian states (c. 1180–700 BCE)
- Nodes
- Kaneš/Kültepe (c. 1950–1750 BCE) · Hattusa (c. 1650–1200 BCE) · Karkemish (II–I millennia BCE)
- Range
- Trade Corridors and Principalities, Not Sole Sovereignty.
- Caution
- The maximum expansion was episodic; vassalage, alliance and direct administration are not equivalent.
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
How an inscription modifies a map
The reading of the Karabel relief allowed the identification of Tarkasnawa as king of Mira and related him to seals preserved or found in Boğazköy. This link between situated monument and mobile documents helped to refine the political geography of western Anatolia. Hawkins also showed the value of the Yalburt inscription and the bronze tablet for locating other southern territories. A Hittite atlas is constructed by assembling these points and relations; its uncertain zones cannot be completed simply by following the frontiers of later periods.
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Central Anatolia and, in imperial phases, northern SyriaCentral Anatolia and, in imperial phases, northern Syria. The footprint marks the indicative center of the area, not a border or an exact point.TERRITORIAL ATLAS · REAL GEOGRAPHY · CHANGING EXTENT
Hittite Atlas
Central Anatolia, Archives and Changing Imperial Frontiers
Cities and merchant colonies connect a multilingual Anatolia; a territorial Hittite state does not yet exist.
WHAT CHANGES · OriginA network of principalities and mercantile enclaves emerges around Kaneš, without a unified territorial monarchy.
- 01 · Kaneš/Kültepec. 1950–1750 BCEAssyrian mercantile archive and Anatolian principalities.
The maximum expansion was episodic; vassalage, alliance and direct administration are not equivalent.
Documentation for every period
The map is interactive. The full chronology is also available below without using any controls.
c. 2000–1700 BCE · Kaneš and Anatolian principalities
Cities and merchant colonies connect a multilingual Anatolia; a territorial Hittite state does not yet exist.
Origin · A network of principalities and mercantile enclaves emerges around Kaneš, without a unified territorial monarchy.
- Kaneš Network · c. 2000–1700 BCE
Trade Corridors and Principalities, Not Sole Sovereignty.
Probable
c. 1650–1500 BCE · Old Kingdom of Hatti
Hattusa consolidated its position, and its kings projected power across Anatolia and into northern Syria with mixed results.
Expansion · Hattusa concentrates several Anatolian principalities and projects campaigns towards Syria, with discontinuous peripheral dominance.
- Old Hittite Kingdom · c. 1650–1500 BCE
Envelope of campaigns and uneven control.
Probable
c. 1500–1430 BCE · Middle Kingdom and recomposition
External pressures and dynastic changes reduced or contested the sphere of influence of Hattusa; the chronological division is a modern construct.
Contraction · Losses and conflicts reduce the kingdom to a core of central Anatolia, from which recomposition begins.
- Central Anatolia · c. 1500–1430 BCE
Approximate core during recomposition.
Probable
c. 1430–1320 BCE · Imperial expansion
The kings of Hatti incorporated much of Anatolia and Syrian states; vassalage and direct administration must be distinguished.
Expansion · The power of Hattusa again extended over Anatolia and northern Syria through vassalages of uneven intensity.
- Hittite Empire · c. 1430–1320 BCE
Approximate maximum extent of control and vassalage.
Probable
c. 1320–1200 BCE · Kadesh, treaty and maturity
Hatti retained northern Syria and made a pact with Egypt; the Battle of Kadesh did not produce the total victory proclaimed by Ramesses II.
Expansion and contraction · The empire retains a broad sphere, but its Syrian fringe is stabilised and disputed against Egyptian power.
- Late Empire · c. 1320–1200 BCE
Shifting frontiers and vassals during the Late Bronze Age.
Probable
c. 1200–1180 BCE · End of the empire
Hattusa ceased to function as an imperial capital and the territorial system broke down; not all Anatolian populations or languages disappeared.
Fragmentation · The imperial administration disappears and the territory fragments into Anatolian and Syrian regions without a common centre.
- Post-imperial Regions · c. 1200–1180 BCE
Area in fragmentation, without common authority.
Probable
c. 1180–700 BCE · Syro-Anatolian states
Carchemish and other kingdoms transformed Luwian and Hittite traditions until their incorporation by powers such as Assyria.
Fragmentation and absorption · From the fragmented space emerge minor Syro-Anatolian kingdoms, later gradually absorbed by neighbouring powers.
- Successor Kingdoms · c. 1180–700 BCE
Constellation of kingdoms, not continuity of the Hattusa empire.
Probable
Documented places
- Kaneš/Kültepe · c. 1950–1750 BCE
Assyrian mercantile archive and Anatolian principalities.
- Hattusa · c. 1650–1200 BCE
Capital, fortifications and multilingual archives.
- Karkemish · II–I millennia BCE
Syrian frontier and Neo-Hittite continuity.
Routes and contacts
- approximate sequence and expansion
- approximate sequence and expansion
The maximum expansion was episodic; vassalage, alliance and direct administration are not equivalent.
Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…