06 · OBJECT · URUK-JEMDET NASR TRANSITION
Jemdet Nasr
A list when Uruk was no longer alone
The tablets show that several settlements in southern Iraq shared ways of keeping accounts.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
The tablets of Jemdet Nasr show that written administration was not confined to Uruk. Clay stores categories and quantities developed by specialists, while nearby villages and centers participated in circuits of goods.
The showcase invites you to follow a sign, not a modern border. The archive allows us to see a changing network of settlements, before dynastic cities established other political landscapes.
The Jemdet Nasr tablets expand the map of writing, but do not prove that the settlement was a subordinate office to Uruk. Shared repertoires could circulate between scribes and centers with changing relationships.
The transition around 3000 BCE includes transformations in ceramics, sealing and administration. The labels “Uruk” and “Jemdet Nasr” organize the archaeology; They were not political identities that its inhabitants necessarily used.
Evidence and interpretation
Documented fact: Jemdet Nasr produced proto-cuneiform tablets from the end of the 4th millennium and is linked to the development of administrative writing. Interpretation and caution: The degree of political dependence on Uruk and the linguistic identity of each scribe cannot be inferred from an isolated tablet. Documented expansion: Jemdet Nasr produced an important set of proto-cuneiform tablets from the late 4th and early 3rd millennium. Interpretation and expanded caution: Language, political dependency, and territorial reach cannot be deduced from graphic similarity alone.
Catalogue facts
- Narrative date
- c. 3100–2900 BCE
- Location
- Jemdet Nasr, Iraq
- Material
- Incised clay
- Context
- Early administrative archive
- Curatorial reading
- The documented fact and its interpretation appear separately in the evidence block.
- Chronology
- Approximately 3100–2900 BCE
- Value
- It demonstrates that archival practice was not limited to Uruk.
- archaeological label
- “Jemdet Nasr” designates a phase and material group, not a known State.
- Documentary coverage
- 2 museum, heritage, primary corpus or research sources for this stop.
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
Clay32 dated objects

≈29,000–27,000 years
Dolní Věstonice I
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
mid-6th–5th millennium BCE
Before Sumer
Sumer
The full 6th–5th millennia BCE provide broad limits for chronological ordering; the record qualifies the date as ‘mid’; the item's date is used, not the broader preceding period.
Read the record
Early Neolithic · VI–V millennia BCE
Twin-chambered vessel from Cova de l’Or
Prehistory
Interval of the VI–V millennia BCE; no precise annual date.
Read the record
ca. 4400–3800 BCE
Before Egypt
Ancient Egypt
Date of the representative vessel, not of the entire predynastic period.
Read the record
V–IV millennium BCE
Overlapping datesBefore Nubia
Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Interval of the V–IV millennia BCE of the element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
Middle Neolithic, c. 4000 BCE
Before Gojoseon
Gojoseon and early Korea
Date of the ceramic element, not of the preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 3500–3000 BCE
Overlapping datesBevel-rimmed bowl
Sumer
The wage ration hypothesis is not used as a functional label.
Read the record
3500–2900 BCE · proto-urban period; towards 3300 BCE as a guide, not exact date
Overlapping datesSusa accounting bulla
Sumer
Posted range; "towards 3300" is just orientation within that range.
Read the record
You are viewingc. 3100–2900 BCE
Jemdet Nasr
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Current record
c. 3100–2900 BCE
Overlapping datesAccount of malt and barley
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Middle Jōmon, ca. 3000 BCE
Overlapping datesBefore Yayoi
Yayoi Japan
Date of the Jōmon element, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
ca. 2500–2200 BCE
Vasiliki
Greek worlds
Date range for the regional pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Before Ancient China
Ancient China
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 2500–2000 BCE
Longshan
Ancient China
Date range for the Longshan pottery assemblage.
Read the record
c. 19th century BCE
Before the Hittites
Hittites
Date of the representative document, not of the entire preceding period.
Read the record
Kotosh-Mito Tradition, c. 2200–1500 BCE; the enclosure is usually situated around 1800 BCE.
Before Pre-Inca Cultures
Pre-Inca cultures
Element tradition interval; "around 1800" orients the enclosure.
Read the record
19th–18th centuries BCE
Queen of the Night
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Paleo-Babylonian period · around 1800 BCE
Plimpton 322
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 1800 BCE
Sumerian King List
Sumer
Date of preserved copy, not of reigns listed.
Read the record
Paleo-Babylonian copy, around 1900–1600 BCE according to CDLI
Love song to Shu-Sin
Sumer
Date of the preserved Paleo-Babylonian copy, not of the origin of the song.
Read the record
Towards 1900–1600 BCE · paleobabylonian; uncertain chronological attribution in CDLI
Si.427 tablet
Sumer
Unclear chronological attribution in CDLI.
Read the record
≈1700–1650 BCE
Phaistos Disc
Greek worlds
The signs have no accepted reading.
Read the record
Towards 1650 BCE
Sumerian Flood of Nippur
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Above all 17th–13th centuries BCE
Boğazköy Archive
Hittites
Main date range for the archive, not a single date for all the tablets.
Read the record
c. 1375 BCE
Linear B
Greek worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 1300 BCE
Alaksandu of Wilusa
Hittites
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 1259 BCE, year 21 of Ramesses II
Treaty with Egypt
Hittites
Date of the treaty and its copy; not of the origin of relations between the two kingdoms.
Read the record
7th century BCE
Flood Tablet
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 700–500 BCE
Babylonian map of the world
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
522–486 BCE
Glazed brick guards
Achaemenid Persia
Date range associated with the reign of the decoration.
Read the record
Towards 509–493 BCE
Rations for women and children
Achaemenid Persia
Date range of the archive and its documents.
Read the record
regional range c. 800 BCE–650 CE
Urewe vessel
Bantu-speaking worlds
Regional date range for the Urewe type, not an individual date for each vessel.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (8)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- A White Wall on the DanubeCeltic worlds · 6th century BCE
- Blue that does not yieldMaya worlds · Documented use from the Classic, c. 300–1500 CE
- Cyrus speaks as king of BabylonAchaemenid Persia · After the conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE
- Early potteryMande Worlds · before ca. 9400 cal BCE
- Made in GaramaGaramantes · I millennium BCE–I millennium CE
- Piece-mold castingAncient China · c. 1600–1046 BCE
- The unfinished gestureBatwa / Twa histories · 1947
- Vessels without a languageBantu-speaking worlds · Urewe, broad regional range ca. 800 BCE–650 CE
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
Three columns to organize an operation
A tablet from the British Museum attributed with a question mark to Jemdet Nasr has three columns of writing on each side. Its fragments were partially joined together and the catalog interprets its content as a possible account. This comparison piece makes practical decisions visible: take advantage of both surfaces and separate entries using columns. He also distinguishes two different problems, the uncertain archaeological origin and the incomplete state of the text. None prevents us from observing how his scribes distributed the information within a small portable support.
- Museum · British Museum · Tablet 116625Access recorded: .
Location and territory
LOCATED SITE
Jemdet Nasr · IraqApproximate marker of the site.Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…