OCEANIA · BININJ/MUNGGUY COUNTRY
Kakadu
Animals painted inside and out
Some paintings show the skeleton and organs of animals, in addition to their silhouette.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Documentary original · Exact correspondence
Documentary photograph of the original or the site indicated in the record.
CC BY-SA 3.0
History and context
Fish and other animals show spines, organs and internal structures. The so-called X-ray style is not an anticipated modern X-ray, but a distinctive way of representing bodies known intimately through fishing, food preparation and relationship with Country.
Kakadu is not the silent remnant of a vanished culture. It is a living landscape cared for by its Bininj/Mungguy Traditional Owners. Thousands of galleries link a long visual history with communities that continue to interpret and protect those places.
Evidence and interpretation
The regional corpus spans approximately 20,000 BP to the contemporary era, but the fish panel has no individual date. The cultural authority and restrictions of the Traditional Owners must accompany any use of these images, in addition to the photographic licence.
Catalogue facts
- Date
- Regional corpus ≈20,000 BP–contemporary era
- Location
- Kakadu National Park · Northern Territory, Australia
- Material
- Mineral pigments on rock
- Custodianship
- Bininj/Mungguy Traditional Owners
- Subject
- Fish in X-ray style
- Record
- ≈5,000 registered galleries; many more estimated
- Caution
- The specific panel has no individual date
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
THE CURRENT OBJECT
Its date is not sufficiently established to place it on the timeline. We keep it here, separate from the dated objects.
Regional corpus ≈20,000 BP–contemporary era
Kakadu
Prehistory
The regional span does not date the photographed panel.
Current recordPigments14 dated objects

≈77,000–75,000 years
Engraved ochre from Blombos
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
≈29,500 years
Willendorf
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
≈25.500–23.500 BCE
Before the San
San histories
Date of the representative element, not ethnic attribution of its authors.
Read the record
≈25.500–23.500 BCE
Before the name San
San histories
Dating of the context of the slabs; anonymous authors.
Read the record
Assemblage ≈36,000–13,000 BP · bison ≈18,400–15,300 cal BP
Altamira
Prehistory
Assemblage range ≈36,000–13,000 BP, converted with 1950 origin; not a single date for the bison. It is an approximate scale conversion for ordering; not a new radiocarbon calibration.
Read the record
≈23,500–21,000 cal BP · debated contextual estimate
Lascaux
Prehistory
≈23,500–21,000 cal BP with 1950 origin; debated contextual estimate, replica image. It is an approximate scale conversion for ordering; not a new radiocarbon calibration.
Read the record
≈23,000–21,000 years
Kostenki I
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
Sequence ≈9300–1300 BP
Cueva de las Manos
Prehistory
Sequence ≈9300–1300 BP converted with 1950 origin; not a single date for all images. It is an approximate scale conversion for ordering; not a new radiocarbon calibration.
Read the record
19th–18th centuries BCE
Queen of the Night
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
8th–7th centuries BCE · orientalizing
Ceramic stand 1010
Iberians
Chronology of the funerary context of Tomb 5, Orientalising horizon.
Read the record
Around 480–470 BCE
Banquet under leopards
Etruscans and Rome
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
4th–3rd centuries BCE
The Karwa textile
Pre-Inca cultures
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 100 BCE
The walls of San Bartolo
Maya worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Preserved manuscript: Postclassic, probably 13th–14th centuries; earlier knowledge
Venus in the codex
Maya worlds
Probable date of the preserved manuscript, not of the origin of its knowledge.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (8)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- BhimbetkaPrehistory · Mesolithic–historical and medieval period
- Blue that does not yieldMaya worlds · Documented use from the Classic, c. 300–1500 CE
- Eland CavePrehistory · Regional tradition of ≈4,000 years · up to historical period
- Game Pass ShelterSan histories · Regional rock art chronology · panel not dated in isolation
- Leang KarampuangPrehistory · Minimum 51,200 years · dating published in 2024
- Quinkan CountryPrehistory · Regional art up to ≈27,000 BP · modern continuity
- Sierra de San FranciscoPrehistory · Broad tradition with direct dates ≈5290–295 BP
- Tassili n’AjjerPrehistory · Corpus ≈6000 BCE–first centuries CE
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
The walls also recorded recent encounters
At Ubirr, the park distinguishes X-ray paintings from contact images: a figure wearing a shirt, boots and hands in pockets is interpreted as a buffalo hunter from around the 1880s. That painting is not the specific panel reproduced here, but a comparison within the same cultural landscape. Its presence undoes the idea of an art confined to a remote past. The walls continued to serve to observe changes, depict food and respond to people arriving from other worlds.
- Heritage · Parks Australia · Ubirr, X-ray art and contact artAccess recorded: .
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Kakadu · AustraliaThe art belongs to numerous places under Bininj/Mungguy custodianship; the footprint is regional.Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…