05 · Designed landscape · governing water
Four gardens and water
The royal garden of Pasargadae
Stone channels divided a space of palaces, shade and cultivation that became a lasting model.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
In Pasargadae, channels and paths ordered the royal garden in sectors around palace buildings. Keeping water on the plain required engineering, labour and continual care, not merely a liking for vegetation.
The four-part scheme influenced later Persian gardens and landscapes of western and southern Asia. Continuity does not mean intact copying: each period reinterpreted an idea of order, freshness and authority.
Stretches of stone channels drew axes and distributed water between pavilions and green areas. Water was decoration, microclimate and visible proof of an administration capable of maintaining flow on a seasonal plain.
UNESCO considers the design a decisive antecedent of the Persian four-sector garden. However, the trees, crops and meanings of Cyrus's phase are reconstructed from incomplete data; we do not have a botanical photograph of the whole.
Evidence and interpretation
Documented fact: UNESCO recognises the four-sector garden of Pasargadae as a prototype of western Asian architecture and design. Interpretation and caution: planted species, exact sensory experience and cosmological symbolism of Cyrus's phase are not fully preserved. Documented extension: The archaeological hydraulic layout and heritage documentation support a formal garden divided by watercourses. Extended interpretation and caution: Avoid presenting the later name čahār-bāgh, exact species or a complete cosmology as inscribed data at Pasargadae.
Catalogue facts
- Narrative date
- 6th century BCE
- Location
- Palatial complex of Pasargadae, Fars
- Material
- Stone channels, cultivated land, water, trees and pavilions
- Context
- Irrigated royal garden between palaces
- Curatorial reading
- The documented fact and its interpretation appear separately in the evidence block.
- Infrastructure
- Preserved stone channels articulated circulation and irrigation between buildings.
- Prototype
- UNESCO recognises Pasargadae as a precedent of the Persian garden organised in four sectors.
- Work
- The landscape required water capture, channel cleaning and continual maintenance, although workers are rarely named.
- Documentary coverage
- 2 museum, heritage, primary corpus or research sources for this stop.
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
THE CURRENT OBJECT
Its date is not sufficiently established to place it on the timeline. We keep it here, separate from the dated objects.
6th century BCE
Four gardens and water
Achaemenid Persia
Garden and hydraulic system, not an individually dated object.
Current recordStone19 dated objects

≈425,000–375,000 years
Swanscombe handaxe
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age for the Hoxnian interglacial (MIS 11); editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
≈77,000–75,000 years
Engraved ochre from Blombos
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
≈25.500–23.500 BCE
Before the San
San histories
Date of the representative element, not ethnic attribution of its authors.
Read the record
≈25.500–23.500 BCE
Before the name San
San histories
Dating of the context of the slabs; anonymous authors.
Read the record
PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional
Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe
Prehistory
Provisional date range for the site; not direct dating of this stone.
Read the record
PPNA · ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional proposal for the site
Grinding stone from Çakmaktepe
Prehistory
Provisional date range for the site and the published tools; the identification of the image is unverified.
Read the record
End of the 4th millennium BCE
Warka Mask
Sumer
The full 4th millennium BCE provides broad limits for chronological ordering; the record specifies the end of the millennium.
Read the record
c. 3500–3100 BCE
Cylinder seal
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 3300–3000 BCE
Uruk Vase
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 3100 BCE
Narmer Palette
Ancient Egypt
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 2900–2600 BCE
Worshiper of Tell Asmar
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 2400 BCE
Statue of Ebih-Il
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 2600–1900 BCE
Weights
Indus civilisation
Date range for the system of weights, not a year-specific date for each example.
Read the record
Reign of Sargon II · 721–705 BCE
Lamassu of Khorsabad
Sumer
Reign interval associated with the piece.
Read the record
645–635 BCE
Ashurbanipal Hunt
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 800–300 BCE
Heads on the wall
Pre-Inca cultures
Framework of the set of architectural heads.
Read the record
first quarter of the 5th century BCE
Sarcophagus of Eshmunazar
Phoenicians
First quarter of the 5th century BCE
Read the record
First half of the 4th century BCE
The statue was the urn
Iberians
First half of the 4th century BCE; date of the funerary context.
Read the record
4th century BCE
The inscription of Pistiros
Thracians
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (9)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- A White Wall on the DanubeCeltic worlds · 6th century BCE
- CemeteryIndus civilisation · ca. 2600–1900 BCE
- Engraved stonePrehistory · Before ≈39,000 cal BP
- Kumbi SalehMande Worlds · medieval occupation; prominent phases between the 11th and 13th centuries
- Soma stonesVedic and later Indian worlds · Rigvedic strata; later ritual tradition
- The quarry remained visibleGojoseon and early Korea · Mainly 6th–5th centuries BCE
- The Thracian HorsemanThracians · Roman era · diffusion especially in the 2nd–3rd centuries CE
- Tichitt wallsMande Worlds · II–I millennia BCE
- Writing with gapsGaramantes · Diverse chronologies
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
A hiding place beside the pavilion
A set of jewellery and other precious metal objects appeared hidden in a water vessel beside one of the pavilions of the garden. Stronach and Gopnik place its hiding in the last days of the empire and use it as evidence that the space remained in use during the Achaemenid period. The find adds a human scale to the channel plan: someone chose that place to protect goods. It does not allow identification of that person or assurance of their fate, but it does show reuse much later than Cyrus's initial project.
Location and territory
LOCATED SITE
Pasargadae · IranMarker of the capital and tomb of Cyrus.Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…