05 · OBJECT · PORTABLE AUTHORITY
Cylinder seal
Rolling an image to seal a decision
When rolled on wet clay, the seal left an image that identified or protected a document.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction for museographic context; it is not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
The seal was rolled on fresh clay to leave a continuous band of figures. On doors, baskets, stoppers or slats, the gesture made it visible that someone had controlled a closing or a movement of goods.
Its power did not lie only in the image. It also depended on the context: the same imprint could identify a person, an office or an institutional relationship.
A cylinder multiplied an image as it rolled, but its function depended on a vulnerable surface: a door, basket, or jar closed with clay. Breaking the imprint made the access visible and turned a small stone into part of a security system.
The Met seal with a procession in front of a façade measures just four centimeters. Its modern impression reveals the entire scene and reminds us that the ancient object and the image band were not observed in the same way.
Evidence and interpretation
Documented fact: The Met dates this bituminous limestone seal to the late Uruk period, ca. 3500–3100 BCE; Its exact origin is not recorded. Interpretation and caution: Assigning the ritual scene to a specific god, owner, or bureaucracy requires an archaeological context that this specimen does not preserve. Documented expansion: The Met documents seals from the late 4th millennium used as a mark of ownership or identification on clasps and tablets. Interpretation and expanded caution: An imprint is not an unambiguous modern signature; It could represent a person, position, office or relationship and its reading depends on the context.
Catalogue facts
- Narrative date
- c. 3500–3100 BCE
- Location
- Mesopotamia; exact provenance not recorded
- Material
- Carved bituminous limestone and clay
- Context
- Administrative sealing and ritual scene
- Curatorial reading
- The documented fact and its interpretation appear separately in the evidence block.
- Reference size
- The Met seal measures approximately 4 × 3,4 cm.
- Use
- Rolled on clay closures and documents.
- Advantage
- A single stone produced a repeatable figurative band.
- Documentary coverage
- 2 museum, heritage, primary corpus or research sources for this stop.
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
Stone19 dated objects

≈425,000–375,000 years
Swanscombe handaxe
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age for the Hoxnian interglacial (MIS 11); editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
≈77,000–75,000 years
Engraved ochre from Blombos
Prehistory
Approximate catalogue age; editorial reference 2026 for ordering only, not calibrated dating.
Read the record
≈25.500–23.500 BCE
Before the San
San histories
Date of the representative element, not ethnic attribution of its authors.
Read the record
≈25.500–23.500 BCE
Before the name San
San histories
Dating of the context of the slabs; anonymous authors.
Read the record
PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional
Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe
Prehistory
Provisional date range for the site; not direct dating of this stone.
Read the record
PPNA · ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional proposal for the site
Grinding stone from Çakmaktepe
Prehistory
Provisional date range for the site and the published tools; the identification of the image is unverified.
Read the record
End of the 4th millennium BCE
Overlapping datesWarka Mask
Sumer
The full 4th millennium BCE provides broad limits for chronological ordering; the record specifies the end of the millennium.
Read the record
You are viewingc. 3500–3100 BCE
Cylinder seal
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Current record
ca. 3300–3000 BCE
Overlapping datesUruk Vase
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 3100 BCE
Overlapping datesNarmer Palette
Ancient Egypt
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 2900–2600 BCE
Worshiper of Tell Asmar
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Towards 2400 BCE
Statue of Ebih-Il
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 2600–1900 BCE
Weights
Indus civilisation
Date range for the system of weights, not a year-specific date for each example.
Read the record
Reign of Sargon II · 721–705 BCE
Lamassu of Khorsabad
Sumer
Reign interval associated with the piece.
Read the record
645–635 BCE
Ashurbanipal Hunt
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 800–300 BCE
Heads on the wall
Pre-Inca cultures
Framework of the set of architectural heads.
Read the record
first quarter of the 5th century BCE
Sarcophagus of Eshmunazar
Phoenicians
First quarter of the 5th century BCE
Read the record
First half of the 4th century BCE
The statue was the urn
Iberians
First half of the 4th century BCE; date of the funerary context.
Read the record
4th century BCE
The inscription of Pistiros
Thracians
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (10)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- A White Wall on the DanubeCeltic worlds · 6th century BCE
- CemeteryIndus civilisation · ca. 2600–1900 BCE
- Engraved stonePrehistory · Before ≈39,000 cal BP
- Four gardens and waterAchaemenid Persia · 6th century BCE
- Kumbi SalehMande Worlds · medieval occupation; prominent phases between the 11th and 13th centuries
- Soma stonesVedic and later Indian worlds · Rigvedic strata; later ritual tradition
- The quarry remained visibleGojoseon and early Korea · Mainly 6th–5th centuries BCE
- The Thracian HorsemanThracians · Roman era · diffusion especially in the 2nd–3rd centuries CE
- Tichitt wallsMande Worlds · II–I millennia BCE
- Writing with gapsGaramantes · Diverse chronologies
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
From a flat impression to a continuous scene
The cylinder did not simply replace one mark with another: it expanded the figurative surface available compared to stamping stamps, used for millennia before. Rolling the stone allowed more complex compositions to be displayed without increasing the size of the transportable object too much. The Met also highlights that the stamps preserve images that have disappeared from other media and allow us to compare styles from successive periods. Its historical value therefore reaches both the identification of operations and the reconstruction of lost visual repertoires.
- Museum · The Met · Stamp with scene in front of a facade, 1983.314.1Access recorded: .
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Mesopotamia; exact provenance not recordedSouthern Mesopotamia and cities of the alluvial plain. The footprint marks the indicative center of the area, not a border or an exact point.Where it is held
The British Museum
Reference material evidence · Documented collection
One of the specific stamps used to document the technique of this synthesis card.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Reference material evidence · Documented collection
Late Uruk seal and impression used as reference material testimony.
The holding institution is documented; public display may change. Check its official record before visiting.
Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…