TREASURES · PRE-POTTERY NEOLITHIC A

Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe

Animals and arrows on a stone from Çakmaktepe

Possible animals and arrows have been identified on this stone. The interpretation of the engraving is not certain.

Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.

Digital recreation of an engraved stone, contextually related to the published find from Çakmaktepe — **DIGITAL RECREATION · compare with figure 15f; not a metric facsimile**
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Rendered view of the GLB model provided for Tracekeepers. Reconstruction generated with Tripo; not a photograph of an original nor an archaeological scan. See the entry's cautions.
Model contributed to the Tracekeepers project

Explore in 3D

Load the model only when you want to explore it. Drag or use the arrow keys to turn it; + and − zoom. Closing it releases its memory.

Digital reconstruction provided by the project and generated with Tripo. It is not an archaeological scan or a metric replica; the gallery scale is adapted for display. The identification of the find relies on the excavation publication, not on the shape of the model alone.

History and context

The publication of the Çakmaktepe excavations presents a grinding stone with three possible gazelles, arrows and other marks. Its authors propose linking the scene to hunting; the identification and interpretation are not definitive.

This record provides context for the project's engraved stone model. It is not the Gorham's Cave grid, which belongs to another place and another period. The digital model is a recreation: it does not itself certify the dimensions or exact reproduction of the published original.

Evidence and interpretation

Published find: Şahin and Miyake, 2025, p. 9, fig. 15f. The gazelles carry a question mark in the study; there is no translation of the drawing or recovered narrative scene.

The find and the tentative reading come from the archaeological publication; the volume, visual materials and GLB details are a contemporary representation.

Catalogue facts

Chronological framework: PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional
Provenance: Çakmaktepe · Şanlıurfa, Turkey
Documented object: Grinding stone with incised decoration · fig. 15f
Interpretation: Possible hunting scene; no secure reading
Digital representation: Project recreation · not a certified archaeological scan
Custodianship: Not inventory-verified for this piece

A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS

Objects connected through time

Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.

The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.

You are viewing

PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional

Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe

Prehistory

Provisional date range for the site; not direct dating of this stone.

Current record

Stone19 dated objects

5 / 19In the centre: Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe

Also connected, without a comparable date (10)

These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.

A White Wall on the DanubeCeltic worlds · 6th century BCE
CemeteryIndus civilisation · ca. 2600–1900 BCE
Engraved stonePrehistory · Before ≈39,000 cal BP
Four gardens and waterAchaemenid Persia · 6th century BCE
Kumbi SalehMande Worlds · medieval occupation; prominent phases between the 11th and 13th centuries
Soma stonesVedic and later Indian worlds · Rigvedic strata; later ritual tradition
The quarry remained visibleGojoseon and early Korea · Mainly 6th–5th centuries BCE
The Thracian HorsemanThracians · Roman era · diffusion especially in the 2nd–3rd centuries CE
Tichitt wallsMande Worlds · II–I millennia BCE
Writing with gapsGaramantes · Diverse chronologies

You can scroll the first group without JavaScript. The other topics are also available below.

Tools

Swanscombe handaxe · ≈425,000–375,000 years · Prehistory
Bilateral harpoon · ≈15,000 years · Magdalenian · Prehistory
Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe · PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional · Prehistory — You are viewing
Grinding stone from Çakmaktepe · PPNA · ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional proposal for the site · Prehistory
Nahal Hemar Knives · 8th millennium BCE · Pre-Pottery Neolithic B context · Prehistory
Gebel el-Arak knife · 3600–3200 BCE · Naqada II C–D · Ancient Egypt
Nippur Cubit · III millennium BCE · usually towards 2650 BCE; approximate · Sumer
Carnelian beads · ca. 2600–1900 BCE · Indus civilisation
Rubber before the stadium · c. 1600–1200 BCE for the oldest specimens · Maya worlds
Maya's cubit · 1330–1295 BCE · end of the 18th dynasty · Ancient Egypt

Without a comparable date (not part of the chronological order):

Bone needle · No individual dating published on this record · Prehistory
Canal and field · IV–III millennium BCE · Sumer
Copper and stone · ca. 3100–2700 BCE · Ancient Egypt
Early metallurgy · c. 1900–1500 BCE · Ancient China
Fawn spear-thrower · Middle Magdalenian · Prehistory
Iron changes the frontier · 3rd–2nd centuries BCE · Gojoseon and early Korea
Ishango, without genealogical shortcut · More than 20,000 years; context ca. 25,000–20,000 BP · Batwa / Twa histories
Jenne-jeno contexts · ca. 250 BCE–1400 CE · Mande Worlds
Soma stones · Rigvedic strata; later ritual tradition · Vedic and later Indian worlds
The quarry remained visible · Mainly 6th–5th centuries BCE · Gojoseon and early Korea
The unfinished gesture · 1947 · Batwa / Twa histories
The workshop inside the ditch · 4th century BCE–3rd century CE, peak in Middle and Late Yayoi · Yayoi Japan

Engraving

Engraved ochre from Blombos · ≈77,000–75,000 years · Prehistory
Altamira · Assemblage ≈36,000–13,000 BP · bison ≈18,400–15,300 cal BP · Prehistory
Lascaux · ≈23,500–21,000 cal BP · debated contextual estimate · Prehistory
Rondelle de Mas-d'Azil · ≈18,000–16,000 years · Prehistory
Lamp from La Mouthe · ≈20,500–13,000 years · Magdalenian framework · Prehistory
Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe · PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional · Prehistory — You are viewing
Twin-chambered vessel from Cova de l’Or · Early Neolithic · VI–V millennia BCE · Prehistory
Before Nubia · V–IV millennium BCE · Nubia, Kerma and Kush
Before Gojoseon · Middle Neolithic, c. 4000 BCE · Gojoseon and early Korea
Cylinder seal · c. 3500–3100 BCE · Sumer
Guadancil idol-plaque · 3750–2500 cal BCE · Iberians
Staff of Anta 4 · Late 4th–first half of the 3rd millennium BCE. · Prehistory
Linear A · c. 1700–1500 BCE · Greek worlds
The Cascajal Block · Proposed c. 1000–900 BCE · Maya worlds
Las Limas · c. 1000–600 BCE · Maya worlds
Motagua jade · c. 900–600 BCE · Maya worlds
The Tello Obelisk · c. 800–500 BCE · Pre-Inca cultures
Twenty-six voiceless signs · 5th–4th centuries BCE · Scythians and Saka
The Raimondi Stele · c. 400–200 BCE according to MNAAHP · Pre-Inca cultures
Dove of the Amarejo · 3rd century BCE · Iberians
Urewe vessel · regional range c. 800 BCE–650 CE · Bantu-speaking worlds
Lukasa · 19th–20th centuries · Bantu-speaking worlds

Without a comparable date (not part of the chronological order):

A tradition that invents · collected in 1993 or 1995 · Batwa / Twa histories
Engraved stone · Before ≈39,000 cal BP · Prehistory
Ishango, without genealogical shortcut · More than 20,000 years; context ca. 25,000–20,000 BP · Batwa / Twa histories
Vessels without a language · Urewe, broad regional range ca. 800 BCE–650 CE · Bantu-speaking worlds
Writing with gaps · Diverse chronologies · Garamantes

Animal imagery

Lion-man · ≈40,000 years · Aurignacian · Prehistory
Before the San · ≈25.500–23.500 BCE · San histories
Before the name San · ≈25.500–23.500 BCE · San histories
Altamira · Assemblage ≈36,000–13,000 BP · bison ≈18,400–15,300 cal BP · Prehistory
Lascaux · ≈23,500–21,000 cal BP · debated contextual estimate · Prehistory
Zaraysk Bison · ≈23,000–21,000 years · Prehistory
Rondelle de Mas-d'Azil · ≈18,000–16,000 years · Prehistory
Lamp from La Mouthe · ≈20,500–13,000 years · Magdalenian framework · Prehistory
Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe · PPNA · site proposal: ≈9600–8800 BCE, provisional · Prehistory — You are viewing
Cueva de las Manos · Sequence ≈9300–1300 BP · Prehistory
Cylinder seal · c. 3500–3100 BCE · Sumer
Queen's Lyre · ca. 2600–2500 BCE · Sumer
The goat from PG 1237 · ca. 2600–2400 BCE · Sumer
Indus seals · ca. 2600–1900 BCE · Indus civilisation
Queen of the Night · 19th–18th centuries BCE · Sumer
Bull-leaping · c. 1600–1450 BCE · Greek worlds
Stag Vessel · 14th–13th centuries BCE · Hittites
Before the Scythians and Sakas · Final Bronze–Initial Iron, ca. 1200–600 BCE · Scythians and Saka
Ivory in Nimrud · 9th–8th centuries BCE · Phoenicians
Lamassu of Khorsabad · Reign of Sargon II · 721–705 BCE · Sumer
The Tello Obelisk · c. 800–500 BCE · Pre-Inca cultures
Ashurbanipal Hunt · 645–635 BCE · Sumer
Banquet under leopards · Around 480–470 BCE · Etruscans and Rome
The oldest knotted carpet · 5th–4th centuries BCE · Scythians and Saka
The silver amphora of Chertomlyk · 4th century BCE · Greek worlds
Thoth in the form of a baboon · 664–30 BCE · Ancient Egypt
Poroina Mare Rhyton · Second half of the 4th century BCE · Thracians
Borovo · 4th century BC C.; 350–300 BCE in the ISAW catalog. · Thracians
Leipzig Fish Plate · Last third 4th–early 3rd century BCE · Greek worlds
Dove of the Amarejo · 3rd century BCE · Iberians
Chão de Lamas pectoral · 3rd–2nd centuries BCE · concealed in the early 1st century BCE · Iberians
Fibula from Lancia · ≈300–100 BCE · Iberians
Horse fibula · 2nd century BCE · disputed chronology · Iberians
The dismantled cauldron · 2nd–1st centuries BCE · Celtic worlds
Kalathos of Alcorisa · 2nd–1st centuries BCE · Iberians
Egyptian oil lamp with a fish, held in Laon · 3rd–4th centuries CE · Ancient Egypt
Laon lamp with fish · 3rd–4th centuries CE · Etruscans and Rome
Gold rhinoceros · ca. 1220–1290; found in 1933 · Bantu-speaking worlds
Zimbabwe birds · main period of Great Zimbabwe, c. 12th–15th centuries · Bantu-speaking worlds

Without a comparable date (not part of the chronological order):

Bhimbetka · Mesolithic–historical and medieval period · Prehistory
Eland Cave · Regional tradition of ≈4,000 years · up to historical period · Prehistory
Fawn spear-thrower · Middle Magdalenian · Prehistory
Game Pass Shelter · Regional rock art chronology · panel not dated in isolation · San histories
Kakadu · Regional corpus ≈20,000 BP–contemporary era · Prehistory
Leang Karampuang · Minimum 51,200 years · dating published in 2024 · Prehistory
Sierra de San Francisco · Broad tradition with direct dates ≈5290–295 BP · Prehistory
Tassili n’Ajjer · Corpus ≈6000 BCE–first centuries CE · Prehistory
The Thracian Horseman · Roman era · diffusion especially in the 2nd–3rd centuries CE · Thracians
Trumpet from Numantia · No individual dating published on this record · Iberians

A closer look

About 1 min to read · 3 sections. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: September 17, 2026.

What was published

The report distinguishes small plaques with geometric lines and a figured grinding stone. For the latter it proposes a hunting reading. The excavators' questions must not disappear when a reproduction is prepared: the image may depict animals without our knowing their full meaning.

Research · Şahin and Miyake (2025) · Çakmaktepe, pp. 4, 8–9 and fig. 15Access recorded: September 17, 2026.

Regional context

Çakmaktepe belongs to the Taş Tepeler archaeological project: a regional investigation of early settlements in Şanlıurfa.

Heritage · Taş Tepeler · Çakmaktepe excavation projectAccess recorded: September 17, 2026.

How to view the reconstruction

Compare the model with the published figure: outline, distribution of motifs and apparent depth of the grooves are distinct aspects. A recreation can serve to observe them without being a facsimile. In this record we do not attribute exact scale, individual use or a concrete history to the digital piece.

Research · Şahin and Miyake (2025) · Çakmaktepe, pp. 4, 8–9 and fig. 15Access recorded: September 17, 2026.

Location and territory

REGIONAL AREA

Çakmaktepe surroundings · southwest of ŞanlıurfaIndicative regional marker: the article places Çakmaktepe about 20 km southwest of Şanlıurfa. It does not represent an excavation grid or the exact location of the piece.

Sources and references

Consult the find publication

Did you enjoy this exhibit?

Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.

Loading your rating…

Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe

Explore in 3D

History and context

Evidence and interpretation

Catalogue facts

Objects connected through time

Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe

Swanscombe handaxe

Engraved ochre from Blombos

Before the San

Before the name San

Engraved stone from Çakmaktepe

Grinding stone from Çakmaktepe

Warka Mask

Cylinder seal

Uruk Vase

Narmer Palette

Worshiper of Tell Asmar

Statue of Ebih-Il

Weights

Lamassu of Khorsabad

Ashurbanipal Hunt

Heads on the wall

Sarcophagus of Eshmunazar

The statue was the urn

The inscription of Pistiros

A closer look

What was published

Regional context

How to view the reconstruction

Location and territory

Sources and references

Did you enjoy this exhibit?