29 · CURIOSITY · KNOWLEDGE
Memory in performance
Who can interpret a lukasa
Mbudye specialists use the board to narrate history and territory; its marks have no universal translation.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Editorial visualisation · Contextual correspondence
Declared editorial visualisation, based on the cartography and sources of the fact sheet; it is not an exact historical frontier.
History and context
Beads, shape, touch and the path followed guide Mbudye specialists as they narrate history and territory.
The interface remains silent until a credited narrator is selected, and never translates a bead as a universal sign.
Evidence and interpretation
A documented object and performative principle; specific content may be restricted.
Catalogue facts
- Narrative date
- 19th–20th centuries and transmitted practice
- Location
- Luba communities, present-day DRC
- Material
- Wood, beads, touch, voice and performance
- Context
- The authority to remember and the right to withhold knowledge
- Curatorial reading
- The documented fact and its interpretation appear separately in the evidence block.
- Dossier axis
- beliefs
- Research record
- BANTU · bantu-belief-lukasa-performance
- Documentary coverage
- 1 museum source, heritage, primary corpus or research for this stop.
A SHARED TOPIC, DIFFERENT MOMENTS
Objects connected through time
Follow a topic across the collections. A shared tag is a way to compare objects, not proof that one culture influenced another.
The order uses the midpoint of each approximate date range; ranges can overlap. Spacing does not represent elapsed time. Swipe, scroll or use the arrows. With the sequence focused, use ← / →, Home or End.
THE CURRENT OBJECT
Its date is not sufficiently established to place it on the timeline. We keep it here, separate from the dated objects.
19th–20th centuries and transmitted practice
Memory in performance
Bantu-speaking worlds
The date of documentation does not establish the age of the living practice.
Current recordWood13 dated objects

C. 10,000 BCE · approximation; debated dating
Shigir Idol
Prehistory
Approximation expressed in the record; dating debated.
Read the record
≈7000 BCE
Holmegaard bow
Prehistory
Date of the Holmegård bow; the Albuñol strings compared in the record date to ≈5300–4900 BCE.
Read the record
ca. 3000 BCE
Abydos Boats
Ancient Egypt
Approximate dating of the set of boats.
Read the record
2600–2400 BCE
Royal Game of Ur
Sumer
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
ca. 2600–2400 BCE
Standard of Ur
Sumer
Unknown function; The scenes do not prove that it was a banner.
Read the record
1330–1295 BCE · end of the 18th dynasty
Maya's cubit
Ancient Egypt
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
c. 1600–1000 BCE, in several phases
Wooden faces
Maya worlds
Deposit made in several phases; not simultaneous manufacture.
Read the record
Second half of the 7th century BCE
Mazarrón 1
Phoenicians
Second half of the 7th century BCE
Read the record
Second half of the 7th century BCE
Mazarrón 2
Phoenicians
Date of the shipwreck and its context; the cargo brings together several objects.
Read the record
5th–4th centuries BCE
Bow and arrows in a case
Scythians and Saka
Typological set of slings; no date for a single specimen.
Read the record
ca. 1760
Kuba ndop
Bantu-speaking worlds
Approximate dating according to the record.
Read the record
19th century
19th-century kora
Mande Worlds
The century of the surviving instrument, not the origin of the musical tradition.
Read the record
19th–20th centuries
Lukasa
Bantu-speaking worlds
Date range of the catalogued object, not the origin of the memory tradition.
Read the record
Also connected, without a comparable date (3)
These objects are not placed after the others: an unknown date does not mean a more recent object.
- Rice on stiltsYayoi Japan · Especially 1st–3rd centuries CE
- Rome learns in terracottaEtruscans and Rome · End of the sixth century BCE
- Tools in relationBatwa / Twa histories · ca. 1947
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
Memory and authority
The Met describes the mbudye as an association of men and women responsible for interpreting Luba political and historical principles. Their authority could reinforce or counterbalance that of kings and chiefs. Mastering memory was not simply about recalling names: it contributed to evaluating the exercise of power. Levels of training regulated who interpreted the boards. It therefore matters who was authorised to speak and to whom, as well as the content each support helped to remember.
- Museum · Metropolitan Museum · Memory Board (Lukasa), 1977.467.3Access recorded: .
Where it is held
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Item or group in the record · Documented collection
The holding institution is documented; public display may change. Check its official record before visiting.
Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…