English
Español
Français
Italiano
Deutsch
Русский
Português
Polski
Română
Svenska
Norsk bokmål
Suomi
Türkçe
العربية
简体中文
한국어
हिन्दी
ΕλληνικάINITIAL ATLAS · NODES AND ROUTES
Map of the Greek worlds
Atlas of the Greek worlds
Explore the stages from the palaces of Crete to the Greek cities.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Editorial visualisation · Contextual correspondence
Declared editorial visualisation, based on the cartography and sources of the fact sheet; it is not an exact historical frontier.
History and context
The map begins in prepalatial Crete and allows progression through 8 phases. Documented places —Knossos, Mycenae, Athens— appear only when they help to read the active period.
Minoan, Mycenaean and Greek polis are connected worlds but not a continuous political identity from Crete.
Evidence and interpretation
The coast is from Natural Earth. The layers distinguish origin, core, direct control, influence, networks, disputed territories and external domains; they are approximate curatorial envelopes, not modern borders. The faint outline preserves the previous phase to make each expansion, contraction or absorption visible. Minoan, Mycenaean and Greek polis are connected worlds but not a continuous political identity from Crete.
Catalogue facts
- Reading mode
- Nodes and contact routes
- Sequence
- 8 phases · Prepalatial Crete (c. 3100–1900 BCE) → First Minoan palaces (c. 1900–1700 BCE) → Neopalatial network (c. 1700–1450 BCE) → Mycenaean administration (c. 1450–1200 BCE) → Postpalatial world (c. 1200–800 BCE) → Poleis and Archaic colonisation (c. 800–480 BCE) → Leagues, wars and Macedonia (c. 480–323 BCE) → Hellenistic kingdoms (323–30 BCE)
- Nodes
- Knossos (c. 2000–1450 BCE) · Mycenae (c. 1600–1100 BCE) · Athens (1st millennium BCE)
- Range
- Approximate island scope.
- Caution
- Minoan, Mycenaean and Greek polis are connected worlds but not a continuous political identity from Crete.
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
Kinships that do not draw borders
The genomic study published by Lazaridis and his collaborators in 2017 gathered data from nineteen ancient individuals from the Aegean and Anatolia. The analysed Minoan and Mycenaean groups shared a large part of their ancestry with the early farmers of western Anatolia and the Aegean, in addition to contributions related to populations of the Caucasus and Iran. The Mycenaeans also presented an additional northern contribution. The research allows tracking mobility and kinship across the sea; it does not transform those biological components into kingdoms, languages or personal identities, nor does it turn a limited sample into the census of an entire civilisation.
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Crete, Aegean and mainland Greece; the museum begins in the Minoan phaseCrete, Aegean and mainland Greece; the museum begins in the Minoan phase. The footprint marks the orientative centre of the scope, not a boundary nor an exact point.TERRITORIAL ATLAS · REAL GEOGRAPHY · CHANGING EXTENT
Atlas of the Greek worlds
From the palatial world of Crete to mainland Greece and the polis
Prepalatial Cretan villages, tombs and workshops are connected by the Aegean; this phase cannot yet be called a Minoan state.
WHAT CHANGES · OriginCretan communities emerge, connected by island routes, still without a common palatial territory.
- 01 · Knossosc. 2000–1450 BCEMinoan palatial centre and archives in Linear A and B.
Minoan, Mycenaean and Greek polis are connected worlds but not a continuous political identity from Crete.
Documentation for every period
The map is interactive. The full chronology is also available below without using any controls.
ca. 3100–1900 BCE · Prepalatial Crete
Prepalatial Cretan villages, tombs and workshops are connected by the Aegean; this phase cannot yet be called a Minoan state.
Origin · Cretan communities emerge, connected by island routes, still without a common palatial territory.
- Crete · ca. 3100–1900 BCE
Approximate island scope.
Probable
ca. 1900–1700 BCE · First Minoan palaces
Knossos, Phaistos and other centres organise storage and ritual; no unique capital demonstrated for all of Crete exists.
Expansion · The island organises around several palaces and their storage areas, without one dominating all of Crete with certainty.
- Palatial centres of Crete · ca. 1900–1700 BCE
Several connected palatial centres.
Probable
ca. 1700–1450 BCE · Neopalatial network
Cretan material influence reaches Aegean islands and coasts; the map shows a maritime network, not a thalassocracy with proven frontiers.
Expansion · The Cretan core adds a network of islands and Aegean coasts; maritime influence does not imply continuous control.
- Minoan Crete · ca. 1700–1450 BCE
Core of the Cretan centres.
Probable - Aegean network · ca. 1700–1450 BCE
Area of contacts and influence, not continuous domination.
Debated
ca. 1450–1200 BCE · Mycenaean administration
Mainland Greek-speaking centres and Knossos use Linear B; Mycenaean influence and control do not turn Minoans and Mycenaeans into a single identity.
Absorption · The political centre shifts towards continental palaces and Knossos, unevenly integrated into Mycenaean networks.
- Mycenaean palatial kingdoms · ca. 1450–1200 BCE
Successor powers administer Knossos and continental centres without forming a unified Aegean kingdom.
Probable
c. 1200–800 BCE · Postpalatial world
Palatial archives disappear and populations reorganise settlements and networks; there is no human or cultural vacuum.
Fragmentation · With the disappearance of palatial administrations, the area divides into regional communities and more local routes.
- Postpalatial Aegean regions · c. 1200–800 BCE
Mosaic of communities without a common palatial administration.
Probable
ca. 800–480 BCE · Archaic poleis and colonisation
Greek communities founded settlements across the Mediterranean and the Black Sea; each polis was autonomous and the routes did not form a national territory.
Expansion · Aegean communities form autonomous poleis and open settlements and contacts across the Mediterranean and the Black Sea.
- World of the Aegean poleis · ca. 800–480 BCE
Aegean core of multiple cities.
Probable - Founding and contact networks · ca. 800–480 BCE
Deliberately discontinuous maritime envelope; no common sovereignty.
Probable
ca. 480–323 BCE · Leagues, wars and Macedonia
Athens, Sparta, Thebes and Macedonia articulated successive spheres; none represented all Greek communities.
Fragmentation and absorption · Leagues and wars redistribute the spheres of the poleis until Macedonia imposes a hegemony of variable reach.
- Leagues and Greek poleis · c. 480–338 BCE
Area disputed by leagues and cities with shifting alliances.
Probable - Macedonian hegemony · 338–323 BCE
Final layer of Macedonian domination; it does not culturally replace all the poleis.
Probable
323–30 BCE · Hellenistic kingdoms
Alexander’s successors ruled distinct territories; Greek language and culture circulated without creating a single Hellenic state.
Fragmentation · After Alexander, Macedonian hegemony is divided among kingdoms that connect the Aegean with an extensive eastern network.
- Macedonia and Aegean · 3rd–2nd centuries BCE
One of several kingdoms and leagues.
Probable - Eastern Hellenistic network · 323–30 BCE
Envelope of distinct kingdoms; not a simultaneously stable frontier.
Debated
Documented places
- Knossos · c. 2000–1450 BCE
Minoan palatial centre and archives in Linear A and B.
- Mycenae · c. 1600–1100 BCE
Citadel, tombs and Mycenaean palatial power.
- Athens · 1st millennium BCE
A polis among many; theatre, citizenship and maritime empire.
Routes and contacts
- Documented historical connection
- Documented historical connection
Minoan, Mycenaean and Greek polis are connected worlds but not a continuous political identity from Crete.
Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…