LIVING AND DOCUMENTED CULTURE · 04
Lions, sphinxes and frontier reliefs
Lions, sphinxes and reliefs formed part of the gates and sanctuaries, not isolated pieces.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction; not a photograph of the original nor documentary evidence.
History and context
The figures took part in architectural circuits, they were not isolated gallery sculptures.
Evidence and interpretation
Synthesis based on UNESCO · Hattusha; UNESCO Memory of the World · Hittite tablets; DAI · The Great Temple. The comparison serves to formulate questions, not to fill gaps in the record with certainties.
Catalogue facts
- Civilisation or trajectory
- Hittite
- Scope
- Visual and Material Arts
- Main area
- Hattusa and the central Anatolian plateau.
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
A relief misidentified for centuries
The figure in the Karabel relief came to be interpreted as an Egyptian sovereign following an old reading tradition. The recognition of its Anatolian features and, finally, the reading of the name Tarkasnawa changed that identification. Comparison with its seals allowed it to be situated within the royalty of Mira. History shows how much an inscription can alter our understanding of an apparently clear image. Attire and pose alone were insufficient to decide who it was: it was necessary to combine epigraphy, geography and other documented objects.
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Central Anatolia and, in imperial phases, northern SyriaCentral Anatolia and, in imperial phases, northern Syria. The footprint marks the indicative center of the area, not a border or an exact point.Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…