LIVING AND DOCUMENTED CULTURE · 04
An imperial style made by many hands
Artisans from different regions contributed techniques and designs to the palaces and their objects.
Museum documentation · free public access, no account required.
Generated reconstruction · Declared visual hypothesis
Declared visual reconstruction, created for museographic contextualisation; not a photograph of the original nor does it constitute documentary evidence.
History and context
Visual coherence was constructed through mobility, commission and technical translation.
Evidence and interpretation
Synthesis based on UNESCO · Pasargadae; UNESCO · Persepolis; UNESCO · Bisotun. The comparison serves to formulate questions, not to fill gaps in the record with certainties.
Catalogue facts
- Civilisation or trajectory
- Persian / Achaemenid
- Scope
- Visual and Material Arts
- Main area
- Persis/Fars, with Pasargadae and Persepolis on the Iranian plateau.
A closer look
About 1 min to read · 1 section. Further reading and sources · free access. Editorial review recorded: .
An object can change attribution
A silver rhyton from the Metropolitan, initially attributed to Iran, is today classified as Thracian by its resemblance to two vessels found in northern Bulgaria; the museum even proposes a common workshop. Its goat forepart was hammered from a sheet, adding legs, horns and ears, while the bowl was made separately. The comparison shows how a prestigious Achaemenid-origin format could acquire regional production. Sharing silhouette and function does not demonstrate that all examples came from an Iranian imperial workshop.
Location and territory
REGIONAL AREA
Approximate maximum envelope; control varied by reigns and regionsApproximate maximum envelope; control varied by reigns and regions. The footprint marks the indicative center of the area, not a border or an exact point.Sources and references
Did you enjoy this exhibit?
Your opinion helps us improve the museum. You can change it whenever you like.
Loading your rating…